SEIU - Service Employees International Union, CTW, CLC

seiu.org TAKE ACTION Stay Informed: Register for email updates. SIGN UP
  • Blog
  • Healthcare
  • Property
  • Public
  • Our Union
  • Members
  • Join Us
  • SEIU Locals
  • Press
  • en espaƱol
  • Blog
  • Our Union
  • Press
  • Moreexpand
  • Healthcare
  • Property
  • Public
  • Members
  • Join Us
  • Get Local
  • En Español

Tag: “North Dakota”

Around the country, local members are sick of big insurance

By Maria Tchijov on September 22, 2009 3:36 PM

In August, we took our message of health care reform to our elected officials during town halls all across the country, and they listened. But, now that they are back in Washington, they are again under the influence of the insurance industry, which is fighting hard to defeat real reform.

So now we need to take on the insurance industry! Today, SEIU members all over the country took part in the "Big Insurance: Sick of It" rallies hosted by MoveOn, HCAN and our other progressive allies. From LA to New York, members arrived at offices of major health insurance providers and demanded to know why they were standing in the way of health care reform.

HCmarchers.jpg

MINNESOTA: Fifty SEIU members joined nearly 250 other activists in marching up to the doors of UnitedHealthcare. They presented their demands to UHC representatives, and staged a 15-minute die-in to bring home the point that insurance companies are truly killing Americans. Local member Tammy Brown, who participated in the protest, said, "Big insurance companies are a roadblock to reform. As long as they keeping reaping record profits, the rest of us will keep losing our raises, our health, and even our lives."

FLORIDA: A group of 60 people protested outside the headquarters of Hygeia, a subsidiary of UnitedHealthcare Group. A delegation of eight protestors met with Hygeia representatives and presented them with their demands.

Florida.jpg

NORTH DAKOTA: Fifty local activists met with the Vice President of Corporate Communications for Blue Cross/ Blue Shield in Fargo, North Dakota. She promised that BCBS would respond to their demands in writing by Friday, and suggested they also meet with the company's CEO.

NEBRASKA: A small group of SEIU members and supporters, led by a local pastor, formed a prayer circle outside the offices of UnitedHealthcare. The pastor also tried to deliver the group's demands to UHC executives, but the staff locked the doors to the building and would not let him enter.

NEW YORK: About 500 people attended an event outside the UHC offices at 1 Penn Plaza. One of the speakers, a new member of 32BJ, recounted how he was forced to go into debt paying for his wife's cancer treatment. Recently, he finally received health insurance, which has allowed him to pay for her medication.

COLORADO: Over 150 people, including 40 SEIU members, protested outside the Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield building in Denver. Three of the participants shared their personal stories about being denied health insurance. Their stories were then underscored by a street theater demonstration that made the same point. The event culminated with three activists attempting to deliver the protestors' demands to BCBS officials. They were turned away at the front door.

CALIFORNIA: Up and down California, SEIU members joined with other activists to take the "Big Insurance: Sick of It" message to the offices of Wellpoint Blue Cross in San Diego, Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Sacramento. And in Santa Ana, United Healthcare got the same message. Over 700 participated in the actions including 265 SEIU members from locals in every division of the union.

Tags: anthem, Blue Cross Blue Shield, Colorado, Florida, HCAN, insurance coverage, insurance industry, locals, minnesota, MoveOn, Nebraska, New York, North Dakota, United healthcare, UnitedHealth Group

The moral imperative of health care reform

By Rafael Noboa Rivera on September 1, 2009 5:44 PM

Last Saturday, I attended a large health care reform rally in Fargo, North Dakota. The rally was attended by over 800 people, and featured a rousing speech by former state Attorney General Heidi Heitkamp and music by the popular regional band Low.

Photobucket (picture courtesy of Joe Geinert)

One of the attendees, Rev. Carter Dary, ELCA spoke to us about why he believes health care reform must happen now:

I was struck by the polite shyness of the crowd. To a person, they were simply demanding that Congress get back to work on reforming our health care system. More than at any other event I've attended this past month, those people who are irredeemably opposed to health care reform seemed starkly out of place, gnashing their teeth in frustration.

Photobucket (picture courtesy of Joe Geinert)

The message was clear, from stem to stern, from speaker to spectator - no matter the difficulty of the task ahead, Congress had to get back to work and press forward with health care reform.

You can see more pictures from the event here. Help us send Congress back to Washington with a clear directive on health care reform--take part in send-off rallies being held across the country.

Tags: healthcare events, healthcare rally, north dakota

Rep. Pomeroy, You Can Do Better

By Rafael Noboa Rivera on July 17, 2009 3:12 PM

Well, you can't say that Earl Pomeroy won't make good on a threat. Late last night, Rep. Pomeroy voted to keep denying coverage to 11% of North Dakota's residents. Late last night, Rep. Pomeroy effectively voted to keep levying a hidden health tax of roughly $1,000 on premiums on North Dakota's businesses and families as a direct result of subsidizing the uninsured.

I recognize that Medicare reimbursement rates for rural providers and hospitals - like those in North Dakota - are a concern. But Pomeroy is incorrect in saying that the bill would keep them as they are now. In the Health Insurance Exchange that is created by the American Affordable Health Choices Act, the public plan that Pomeroy is so adamant will prove harmful for North Dakota pays providers and hospitals Medicare rates plus 5% - and that's only for the first three years! After that, the plan begins negotiating with providers and hospitals for a payment rate. It could remain the same...or, what is more likely, it could increase! In fact, the American Medical Association, which has an even bigger interest in Medicare reimbursement rates than Earl Pomeroy, looked at the same bill he voted against...and endorsed it!

What's so harmful about that?

In North Dakota, small businesses comprise 81% of businesses in that state - but only 36% of those small businesses offer coverage to their workers, because of the crushing costs of coverage. A public option would allow those small businesses to take care of their workers and compete in today's economy.

What's so harmful about that?

In short, Earl Pomeroy voted against North Dakota's interests deep in the dark of night. The bright light of day shows his arguments for what they are, because nothing can be more harmful for the people of North Dakota than a health care system that defers and denies their dreams of success and security, a health care system that leaves over a tenth of its population uncovered and ill-treated, and shackles its economy in competitive chains.

Mr. Pomeroy, you can and must do better for the people of your state. A state and nation are waiting, but can ill afford it for much longer.

Tags: Earl Pomeroy, healthcare reform, North Dakota

What Would North Dakota Look Like if the Chamber Got Its Way?

By Rafael Noboa Rivera on July 10, 2009 1:54 PM

Below is the text of a message we sent out today. Please take a moment to write both Senator Byron Dorgan and Kent Conrad to urge them to continue listening to us here in North Dakota:

It's hard to imagine how things could be worse these days: between unemployment, the financial crisis, and the state of healthcare, it's no secret that North Dakota is hurting.

But if you can believe it, there's a group that continues to fight ways to improve the lives of North Dakotans.  For years, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce has done all it can to stop working people in North Dakota from getting ahead.

email20090709-chamber.jpg

Click here to write to Senator Conrad and Senator Dorgan and tell them to continue listening to the needs of working people, not the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.

What would North Dakota look like if the U.S. Chamber got its way through the years?  The picture isn't pretty.

  • The U.S. Chamber opposed the minimum wage hike in 2007.  About $20 million would be generated for 48,000 North Dakotans resulting from the 2007 schedule for minimum wage increases, research shows.  The U.S. Chamber says they have "consistently opposed increasing the federal minimum wage."
  • The U.S. Chamber opposed a bill to expand healthcare coverage for children.  5,460 North Dakotan children would gain from the 2009 healthcare initiatives, studies indicate.  The U.S. Chamber opposed a bill to expand
    healthcare coverage for millions of uninsured children.
  • The U.S. Chamber consistently defends outsourcing jobs.  4,300 North Dakota jobs were lost to outsourcing in 2007 alone.  The U.S. Chamber says that there are "legitimate values in outsourcing" and that Americans are "short of skills."

The U.S. Chamber's been on the wrong side of so many issues important to North Dakota's families.  But that's just the beginning.

Just like they're going all out to stop healthcare reform, the U.S. Chamber is doing anything it can to oppose the Employee Free Choice Act - yesterday heir lead lobbyist warned of "Armageddon on Capitol Hill."

Click here to write to Senator Conrad and Senator Dorgan and tell them to continue listening to working people, not the greedy CEOs at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.

We need to make sure our senators know that the U.S. Chamber of Commerce doesn't have the best interests of our state in mind: just those of the same greedy CEOs that hurt our economy in the first place.

Click here to send a message now.

Thanks for writing to Senator Conrad and Senator Dorgan.  Your voice can make the difference.

In solidarity,

Ryan Nagle
North Dakota Change that Works
www.changethatworks.net/ND

Tags: chamber, chamber of commerce, employee free choice act, healthcare reform, North Dakota

If the U.S. Chamber Had Their Way, North Dakotans Would Suffer

By Rafael Noboa Rivera on July 8, 2009 7:17 PM

When CEOs in Washington decide the agenda of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, they seem to forget all about real workers and business owners throughout America. For decades, they have fought legislation that would have a real impact on working families right here in North Dakota. With 16,000 North Dakotans out of work, now is the time to do everything we can to stand up to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce - and stand up for working families.

The U.S. Chamber opposed wage hikes that not only benefited tens of thousands of North Dakotans but also pump more than $20 million into the state economy. They opposed a children's health care that will not only cover 5,460 more children in North Dakota, but also will create more than 350 jobs in the state. The U.S. Chamber doesn't speak for working families in North Dakota.

 

IMPACT OF MINIMUM WAGE HIKES ON NORTH DAKOTA:

 The U.S. Chamber "Has Consistently Opposed Increasing the Federal Minimum Wage." In July 2007, Marc Freedman, the labor law policy director at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, wrote, "The U.S. Chamber of Commerce has consistently opposed increasing the federal minimum wage." He added, "Increasing the minimum wage does not even help those it is intended to benefit." [Atlanta Journal-Constitution, 7/17/07]

 U.S. Chamber Official on Wage Hike: "We Have Taken The Hell No Attitude." "We have taken the 'hell, no' attitude," said the U.S. Chamber's Randel Johnson discussing a proposed minimum wage increase in 1999. "I don't care what the 20-second sound bites say. This move hurts lower-income, lower-skilled workers."[Akron Beacon Journal, 6/21/99]

 U.S. Chamber Official: "We Don't Think Government Ought to Be in the Business of Setting Wages." In 2002, U.S. Chamber spokesman Randy Johnson said, "We don't think the government ought to be in the business of setting wages." [Washington Times, 5/6/02]

 U.S. Chamber: "Wage Mandates Ignore the Principles of Free Market Economies." In an amicus brief filed with the Supreme Court of Louisiana, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce wrote, "Wage mandates ignore the principles of free market economies; they prevent businesses from making profits, growing and hiring more workers; and they base wages on what the worker wants instead of on the value of work performed." [The Pantagraph, 11/21/04]

 

2007 Minimum Wage Hike Could Pump $20.1 MILLION Into North Dakota's Economy. The average American works 1,916 hours every year. In 2007, 5,000 North Dakotans earned at or below the federal minimum wage. With an increase from $5.15 an hour to $7.25 an hour by July 2009, the 2007 wage increase passed by Congress could pump $20.1 million into North Dakota's economy. [Bureau of Labor Statistics, "Work Schedules in the National Compensation Survey," 7/28/08; Bureau of Labor Statistics, "Characteristics of Minimum Wage Workers: 2007," 5/7/08; EPI, "What a new federal minimum wage means for the states," 5/25/07]

 

Study Found That 48,000 North Dakotans Would Benefit From the 2007 Minimum Wage Hike. The Economic Policy Institute found that approximately 48,000 people in North Dakota alone would benefit from a federal minimum wage increase to $7.25 an hour. This include those workers that were earning less than $7.25 as well as workers that would benefit indirectly as other wages increase proportionately. EPI explained, "While a raise is not legally mandated for these workers, empirical evidence shows that many employers raise the wages of workers earning above the new minimum wage in order to preserve internal wage structures, an occurrence known as the 'spillover effect.'" [EPI, "Issue Guide on Minimum Wage, 8/1/08]

 

 IMPACT OF FAIR PAY LAWS ON NORTH DAKOTA:

 U.S. Chamber Opposed Equal Pay Bill, Saying it Would "Undermine America's Civil Rights Laws." In a January 2009 letter to Congress, R. Bruce Josten of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce wrote that the U.S. Chamber opposed the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act, a bill to protect workers who receive unfair pay for equal work, "on both substantive and procedural grounds." Discussing another fair pay bill this year, the Chamber's Randel Johnson said, "further increasing the opportunity for frivolous litigation would only further serve to undermine America's civil rights laws." [Chamber Letter, 1/14/09; Chamber Press Release, 1/9/09]

 U.S. Chamber Opposed 1998 Equal Pay Law for Women. In 1998, the U.S. Chamber opposed President Clinton's call for legislation to strengthen laws reducing disparities in men and women's earning power. Randel Johnson, vice president of labor policy at the chamber, said that wage disparities are due mainly to the interruption of many women's job careers to raise families. "Work experience does tend to translate to greater wages," Johnson said. [AP, 6/10/98]

 

Women in North Dakota Earn Only 69% Of What Their Male Counterparts Make, Below the National Average. According to a study released by the National Women's Law Center, "In 2007, on average, women in North Dakota working full-time, year-round earned only 69% of what men working full-time, year-round earned3 -- nine percentage points below the nationwide average of 78%. The wage gap is even more substantial when race and gender are considered together. White, non-Hispanic women working full-time, year-round in North Dakota earned only 70% of the wages of White, non-Hispanic men. However, Native American women working full-time, year-round in North Dakota earned only 59% of the wages of White, non-Hispanic men." [National Women's Law Center, April 2009]

 

 IMPACT OF OUTSOURCING ON NORTH DAKOTA:

 U.S. Chamber President Defended Outsourcing of U.S. Jobs, Arguing That Americans Are "Short of Skills." Defending outsourcing in 2004, U.S. Chamber of Commerce President Tom Donohue said, "The big fundamental issue that we need to understand is we are short of skills in this country. Five years from now we'll have 10 million skilled jobs and we haven't got the people to fill." [CNNFN, 5/3/04]

 U.S. Chamber President: "There Are Legitimate Values in Outsourcing." In 2004, U.S. Chamber of Commerce President Tom Donohue said, "there are legitimate values in outsourcing -- not only jobs, but work -- to gain technical experience and benefit we don't have here, to lower the price of products, which means more and more of them are brought into the United States, used, for example, I.T., much broader use than it was 10 years ago, create more and more jobs. But the bottom line is that we outsource very few jobs in relation to the size of our economy. We employ -- American companies employ 140 million Americans. They provide health care for 160 million Americans. They provide training in terms of 40 billion a year. The outsourcing deal over three or four or five years and the two or three sets of numbers are only going to be, you know, maybe two, maybe three million jobs, maybe four." [CNNFN, 2/10/04]

 U.S. Chamber President Suggested More Jobs Were Brought In to the U.S. Than Outsourced to Other Countries. In 2004, U.S. Chamber of Commerce President Tom Donohue said, "nobody knows where Lou got 2.2 [million] outsourced jobs. Maybe we've got 300,000 in the last couple of years. The most interesting thing is that if you take an annual basis, we insource in the very same categories of work $16 billion more than we outsourced, which is 2 million jobs." [CNNFN, 9/2/04]

 

In 2007 Alone, North Dakota Lost 4,300 jobs to Outsourcing. According to a study from the Economic Policy Institute, North Dakota lost 4,300 jobs as a result of the U.S. non-oil trade deficit in 2007 alone. Nationwide, 5.6 million jobs were lost. 70% of these jobs were in the manufacturing sector. [EPI, 10/2/08]

 

 IMPACT OF CHILDREN'S HEALTH CARE ON NORTH DAKOTA:

 Chamber Opposed 2009 Bill to Expand Children's Health Care. In a January 2009 letter to Congress, R. Bruce Josten of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce urged members to vote against the Children's Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2009, writing that the bill "raises taxes on a narrow sector of the U.S. economy with the aim of funding a broad-based entitlement program, which is grossly unfair and burdensome to American businesses and consumers." [Chamber Letter, 1/14/09]

 Chamber Opposed 2007 Bill to Expand Children's Health Care. In September 2007, the Phoenix Business Journal reported, "The U.S. Chamber of Commerce is opposing a federal plan to raise tobacco taxes to fund government-provided health services for uninsured children. That puts the U.S. Chamber on the same side of the issue as the Bush administration." "To prejudice a narrow sector of the U.S. economy with the aim of funding a broad-based entitlement program is grossly unfair and burdensome to American businesses and consumers," said the chamber in a letter to congressional leaders on the issue. [Phoenix Business Journal, 9/26/07; Chamber Letter, 7/17/07]

 

5,460 North Dakota Children Could Gain Coverage Under the 2009 SCHIP Expansion. A 2009 report from Families USA found that 5,460 North Dakota children could be covered under the 2009 bill to expand and reauthorize the State Children's Health Insurance Program. [Families USA, January 2009]

 

Children's Health Care Reauthorization Will Bring $74 Million Into North Dakota, Creating 362 Jobs.  In 2007, a Families USA study found: "With $50 billion in additional federal funding for SCHIP and Medicaid, SCHIP reauthorization could bring North Dakota approximately $74.2 million in new federal funding for children's health coverage over the next five years. This would result in the state getting three times the amount it would have otherwise gotten for SCHIP... Over the next five years, $74.2 million in new federal funding will create: $27.2 million in increased business activity, $9.9 million in increased wages, and 362 additional jobs for North Dakota." [Families USA, May 2007]

 

 IMPACT OF MEDICARE ON NORTH DAKOTA:

 Chamber Opposed 2008 Bill to Prevent Medicare Cuts. In June 2008, R. Bruce Josten of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce wrote that the Chamber opposed the Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act of 2008, S. 3101, because it would cut the Medicare Advantage program. Referring to the bill, and the cuts to the private insurance Medicare Advantage program, the American Medical Association aired an ad saying "A group of U.S. senators voted to protect the powerful insurance companies at the expense of Medicare patients' access to doctors." [Chamber Letter, 6/12/08; AP, 7/2/08]

 

Nearly 100,000 Medicare Beneficiaries, Along With 31,664 Military Members and Their Families, Would Have Been Affected If 2008 Medicare Cuts Had Gone Through. In 2008, the Chamber opposed a bill that prevented a 10.6% cut in Medicare payments to doctors. According to the American Medical Association, 98,257 Medicare patients and 31,664 TRICARE patients in North Dakota would have been affected by these cuts. [American Medical Association, February 2009]

 

 IMPACT OF SOCIAL SECURITY ON NORTH DAKOTA:

 U.S. Chamber Opposed the 1935 Social Security Act. According to an official history of Social Security, "In 1935, while there were long debate and votes on many amendments, the Congress passed the Social Security Act by an overwhelming majority.  In the House, the vote was 372 yeas, 33 nays and 25 not voting.  The vote in the Senate was equally positive, with 77 yeas, 6 nays and 12 not voting.  President Franklin Delano Roosevelt signed the Act into law on August 14, 1935.  Despite the strong support, there was vocal opposition to the Act, both in the Congress and externally.  The minority members of the House Ways and Means Committee said it would impose a crushing burden upon industry and upon labor.  The U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the National Association of Manufacturers opposed the bill." [SSA History: History of SSA 1993-2000]

 U.S. Chamber Wanted to Postpone 1935 Social Security Act. In June 1935, the New York Times reported on a "broad program for recovery and re-employment" adopted by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. On Social Security, they reported, "The chamber will continue to advocate that enactment of the major features of the pending social security legislation be postponed until there can be further examination by a Congressional committee. If a study of this character is made, the chamber will present to such a committee its views as to the constitutionality of the legislation as proposed and will emphasize the fact that the proposals now pending would double the entire present volume of Federal taxes." [New York Times, 6/16/35]

 U.S. Chamber President: Any Social Security Reform "Must" Include Privatization. In June 2005, Thomas J. Donohue, President of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, co-wrote an op-ed that stated, "any Social Security reform must meet four core principles," including "Giving younger workers the option of investing part of their payroll taxes in personal retirement accounts." In January 2005, Donohue  "said a Social Security overhaul is 'doable' this year and said the Chamber believes 'individual investment accounts must be an important component of reform.' [Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, 6/7/05; National Journal's CongressDaily, 1/5/05]

 

If Social Security Were Privatized, North Dakota Would Lose At Least $500 Million Every Year. According to a 2005 report by the National Women's Law Center, "In 2002, $1.1 billion flowed into the North Dakota economy through Social Security benefits." If the cuts expected under President Bush's plan were to take effect currently, "North Dakota would lose $0.5 billion per year, even including the proceeds from private accounts. This amount is equivalent to 19% of state government expenditures in fiscal year 2002 (state government expenditures include money generated from state funds, federal funds, and the sale of state bonds). [National Women's Law Center, February 2005]

 

Privatizing Social Security Would Impose a $1.8 BILLION Unfunded Mandate on North Dakota. According to the Institute for America's Future in 2005, the Bush Social Security privatization plan would create a new $1.8 billion unfunded federal mandate on the state of North Dakota and would plunge at least 15,000 North Dakota seniors into poverty. [Institute for America's Future, April 2005]

 

Women in North Dakota Would Be Hard Hit If Social Security Were Privatized, With Widow's Benefit Dropping $4,380 Per Year. According to a 2005 report by the National Women's Law Center, "The typical recipient of a Social Security widow's benefit in North Dakota receives $811 per month ($9,732 per year).  According to the Congressional Budget Office, under Plan 2 of the President's Commission to Strengthen Social Security, today's kindergarteners are projected to receive 45% less than they are promised under current law, even when the proceeds from their private accounts are included in the total.  If such a benefit cut were to take effect currently, the typical widow in North Dakota would receive only $446 per month ($5,352 per year), an amount equal to only 62% of the poverty line. [National Women's Law Center, February 2005]

 

 IMPACT OF WORKER SAFETY ON NORTH DAKOTA:

 The U.S. Chamber of Commerce Vigorously Opposed Occupational Safety Regulations. In an article written between the initial bill supported by President Johnson and the second bill, that passed, supported by President Nixon, the New York Times reported: "The first legislation providing for a comprehensive nationwide system of health and safety standards was proposed last year by President Johnson.  Strongly supported by labor, the bill ran into immediate and vigorous opposition from industry, led by the Chamber of Commerce of the United States." [New York Times, 12/10/69]

 The U.S. Chamber of Commerce "led the fight to defeat the 1968 bill." [New York Times, 3/19/70]

 U.S. Chamber Argued That OSHA Was a Failure. In 1979, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce charged "that the Occupational Safety and Health Administration had failed to reduce worker injuries and illnesses significantly since its inception in 1970." Mark De Bernardo of the Chamber wrote, "In the wake of piles of more O.S.H.A. rules and paperwork, fatal injuries on the job soared by more than 24 percent from 1976 to 1977." [New York Times, 8/27/79]

 U.S. Chamber Spokesman Said OSHA Is a "Blatant Denial of Fundamental Fairness." When describing the structure of the Labor Department within the Executive Branch rather than the Judicial Branch of the government, Richard Berman, then director of labor law for the United States Chamber of Commerce, said "This has a chilling effect on an employer's exercise of his right to appeal and is thus a blatant denial of fundamental fairness." Berman now runs the Center for Union Facts, a corporate front group trying to defeat the Employee Free Choice Act. [U.S. News & World Report, 11/24/75; New York Times, 1/9/09]

 

In 2007, 25 Workplace Fatalities Were Reported in North Dakota. In 2007, 25 North Dakotans reportedly died as a result of workplace injuries. [BLS Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries, 2007]

 

 


Tags: chamber, employee free choice act, healthcare organizing, healthcare reform, North Dakota

North Dakotans Argue For Health Care Reform Now

By Rafael Noboa Rivera on July 5, 2009 4:32 PM
Watch the video above as two North Dakotans make the case for quality, affordable health care reform for all.

Tags: healthcare action, healthcare reform, North Dakota

State Legislators to Federal Lawmakers: We Need Health Care Reform Now

By Rafael Noboa Rivera on June 17, 2009 5:28 PM

North Dakota State Legislators Sen. Aaron Krauter, Sen. Carolyn Nelson, and Rep. Richard Holman signed onto a letter along with 700 state legislator from every state, to the President, HHS Secretary Sebelius and leaders of Congress, asking them to support key ingredients for real health care reform. Today, a delegation of legislators from around the nation will be on Capitol Hill to meet with the White House and deliver the letter.

State legislators are at the forefront of good health care reform with states like North Dakota looking for ways to implement health care reform through mechanisms like the State Office of Rural Health.

From the letter:

Key priorities for reform are reflected in recent state initiatives and public opinion polls which show that Americans want more choices and options for quality health care. Americans recognize that the private sector alone has proven incapable of creating a high-quality, fair, and accountable health care system that works for all families. Therefore, a key priority for reform is the choice of a public health insurance plan that is available to businesses, individuals, and families.

These are elected officials who have been legislating on health care reform for years, and have a keen understanding of how burdensome our broken health care system is for state budgets and for people's pocketbooks.

Read the entire letter being delivered on the Progressive State Network's website. You can find a list of North Dakota state legislators after the jump.

Tags: health insurance reform, healthcare reform, healthcare system reform, north dakota

Tell Sen. Conrad - Support the Public Option!

By Rafael Noboa Rivera on June 8, 2009 9:10 AM

Tags: click to call, North Dakota, phone bank, public health care plan option

The Value of Reform in North Dakota

By Rafael Noboa Rivera on May 29, 2009 4:54 PM
On Wednesday, you saw Sen. Kent Conrad sit down with Andy Stern & others to discuss health care reform. Yesterday, SEIU released a report (PDF) on rising health care costs and the value of reform in North Dakota. These are the facts behind our argument.

The facts speak for themselves - in a state like North Dakota, health care reform is not just about improving the health and safety of Americans, it's also a bottom-line, balance sheet issue. The rising cost of health care is precisely why we need a public option for health care.

Government, families and businesses large & small stand to save trillions from fixing health care. It will strengthen North Dakota's businesses, help us retain jobs, and provide greater access and choices to citizens in need of care, especially if a public option is present.

Here are some highlights from the report:

On cost & savings: A reformed system will save people over $7,000 in premium & out-of-pocket expenses over the next decade.

  • In North Dakota, health insurance premiums grew by 74.3%, while median earnings only grew by 26.4%.
  • The median yearly wage for North Dakota in 2007 was only $24,255, but the average health care premium was $10,674. By this metric, premiums grew nearly 2.8 times faster than wages.
  • This year, 90% of North Dakotans with health insurance are projected to spend over 10% of their pre-tax income on health care costs.

If this keeps up, by 2016, North Dakota's families will be paying around $20,000 each year - the cost of a new family car. It would mean that 41% of the median household income in North Dakota would go towards health care costs.

On the uninsured: There are over 47 million uninsured Americans. Each day, another 14,000 people join their ranks. Because of that, we pay a hidden tax on our insurance premiums of 8% - coming from a failure to cover all Americans. In North Dakota, that means that families with insurance pay over $1,000 a year extra on their insurance premiums to help cover the cost of the uninsured.

  • Each day, 10 North Dakotans lose their insurance;
  • As of 2007, North Dakota had over 14,000 uninsured children, and 150,000 non-elderly adult North Dakotans had no health insurance. Of that number, 85% were employed, but either they couldn't afford their employer's health insurance plan, or their employer simply didn't offer coverage of any kind.
  • Over 19,000 of the uninsured adults were between the ages of 50-64, meaning that over 7% of North Dakota's aging adults are uninsured.
On fixing the economy:

We cannot fix the economy without fixing health care. The cost of health care is out of control, and we can do better. We need affordable health care we can count on, and federal action is essential to helping Nebraska cope with soaring health care costs.

  • In 2007, North Dakota's economy lost as much as $269 million because of the poor health & shorter lifespans of the uninsured. That adds up to $4,400 for each uninsured North Dakotan.
  • As of 2007, 14% of all state spending in North Dakota has gone to Medicaid and SCHIP. $513 million went to Medicaid alone.
  • Nationally, health care spending accounts for 16% of our gross domestic product (GDP). That share is projected to nearly double in the next 25 years.

Modernizing our health care system could save us nearly $600 billion in health spending over the next decade and $9 trillion over the next quarter century.

There's more in the report, which you can download here (PDF). One thing is made clear - the American people deserve action, and action now, on creating an affordable health care system for all.


Tags: healthcare crisis, North Dakota, value of reform, value of reform report

North Dakota Needs the Employee Free Choice Act

By Rafael Noboa Rivera on May 28, 2009 2:01 PM

Union Members in North Dakota and Across the Country Earn Significantly More Than Non-Union Workers. Over the four-year period between 2004 and 2007, unionized workers' wages in North Dakota were on average 13.8 percent higher than non-union workers with similar characteristics. That means that, all else equal, North Dakota workers that join a union will earn 13.8 percent more--or $2.28 more per hour in 2008 dollars--than their otherwise identical non-union counterparts. [Unions are Good for North Dakota's Economy, 2/18/09]

  • Employee Free Choice Would Pump Money Into Rural Economies. The League of Rural Voters writes, "Declining worker incomes have meant declining incomes for farmers and ranchers who produce food, fiber and biofuels. And that means less money has been coming into the rural economy. A big reason for shrinking worker paychecks is that big business has made it nearly impossible to join unions and bargain for solid benefits and fair wages (15 - 25 percent higher than non-union jobs). In fact, thousands of people are illegally fired every year just because they tried to organize a union. The Employee Free Choice Act can help level the playing field by making it easier for people to join unions and bargain for a better standard of living. It can give regular working folks the purchasing power to revive the economy - and to buy the products we grow and sell in rural America." [League of Rural Voters, 5/19/09]
  • Higher Wages & Benefits Help U.S. Economy by Giving Workers the Ability to Purchase More Goods & Services. According to the Center for American Progress Action Fund report, unionization is good for the economy overall and "putting more money in workers' pockets would provide a needed boost for the U.S. economy." Former Secretary of Labor Robert Reich stated that higher wages and higher benefits would give workers the purchasing power they need to buy more of the goods and services that this economy produces. [CAP Report: Unions are Good for the American Economy, 2/18/09]

Workers At Dakota Gasification Co. Waited More Than a Year for Their First Contract. In July 2001, the Bismarck Tribune reported, "Tuesday's decision by the Dakota Gasification Co., board of directors to approve its first union contract for plant workers ends months of uncertainty for both sides. It also means that the 447 plant workers who were represented by the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers during contract negotiations can now become union members. Their membership was pending a union-bargained contract, which hit some rough sledding the last two months, including a confidential strike vote and federal mediation." [Bismarck Tribune, 7/12/01]

  • Union Accused Management of Changing Items in a Negotiated Contract. In June 2000, workers at Dakota Gasification Co. voted to join the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers. In June 2001, the Bismarck Tribune reported, "Dakota Gasification Co. workers have ratified what they believe is the company's contract offer, but negotiations could end up in a complaint with the National Labor Relations Board. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers approved their version of the contract Tuesday, charging that plant owner Basin Electric Power Cooperative changed or deleted a number of negotiated items. Union business manager Gary Leinius said if Basin doesn't accept the contract ratification after it's presented to them Monday, the union will make a formal complaint based on bad faith negotiations." [Bismarck Tribune, 6/14/01, 6/21/00]

Union Accused MDU Resources Group of Failing to Negotiate in Good Faith. In August 2008, "The International Union of Operating Engineers/Local 49 filed an Unfair Labor Practices charge against Knife River, a construction materials and mining subsidiary of Bismarck-based MDU Resources Group Inc. Knife River is an aggregate producer in Sauk Rapids, Minn. Local 49 business manager Glen Johnson said the 25 workers at the Minnesota plant approached Local 49 for representation in negotiating a contract in January. After nine months without success, Local 49 filed the charges, saying that Knife River was not negotiating fairly and in good faith... Johnson said he believes the company is deliberately trying not to come to an agreement, because after a total of 12 months they are no longer legally obligated to negotiate the contract." [Bismarck Tribune, 8/13/08]


Tags: employee free choice act, North Dakota, union drives, union elections, union-busting

Tune In: Health Care Roundtable with Sen. Kent Conrad

By Rafael Noboa Rivera on May 23, 2009 12:46 PM

Tags: healthcare roundtable, kent conrad, North Dakota

Amy Ingersoll Discusses Health Care Reform

By Rafael Noboa Rivera on May 20, 2009 6:24 PM

Amy Ingersoll is a hard-working North Dakotan. Every day, she helps save lives as a 911 dispatcher in Bismarck.

When her son Devon was diagnosed with asthma, though, Amy and her family didn't have health insurance. Devon's medicines cost more than $600 a month. If she had gotten insurance through her work, she would've spent $900 a month; an independent plan would have cost her between $300 and $500 a month, but because they considered Devon's asthma a "pre-existing condition", the plan wouldn't have covered *any* of the costs.

Amy's only alternative was to pay for Devon's medicines out of her own pocket. During that time, Amy spent over a third of her income just to cover Devon's illness.

Sadly, Amy's story isn't unique. Too many Americans across the country are at the mercy of unreliable employer-based plans, and too many fall through the cracks.

"Now's not the time for black-and-white arguments," Amy says. "People worry that our current system will be swallowed up by a new one that leaves us without choices, i.e., "socialized
medicine." But this isn't an either/or proposition, and we shouldn't fall into that trap. We are creative enough to enhance our own system and fill in the gaps to make it work for everybody. We need to find our own American solution to our healthcare crisis."

The time is now for open minds and better alternatives in our health care system. Reforming health care doesn't mean replacing our current system; it means we make it work for everyone once more.

Tags: Amy Ingersoll, healthcare insurance, healthcare stories, North Dakota

Cost of Doing Nothing: North Dakota

By SEIU Change That Works on February 25, 2009 5:03 PM
We cannot get our economy back on track without repairing the American health care system. Health care reform is not just a moral imperative, but also an economic necessity. In 2007, the U.S. economy lost as much as $207 billion as a result of the poor health and shorter lifespan of the uninsured. Skyrocketing health care costs add to families' already overwhelming burden, threatening their health and financial security. We can do better. Solving America's health care crisis will improve quality of care, reduce costs and make businesses more competitive. The urgent need for reform is more apparent now in North Dakota than ever. In the past eight years, health care premiums for family coverage have risen more than twice as fast as wages. With 3.5% unemployed, many families are at risk of losing their health coverage. The message is clear: North Dakota's families urgently need Congress to take direct action on health care reform.

Supporting Facts


  • Health Insurance premiums in North Dakota increased by 74.3% from 2000 to 2007, while median earnings only increased a mere 26.4%. The median yearly wage in 2007 for North Dakota was only $24,255, but the average health care premium for a family was $10,674. This means that premiums grew 2.8 times faster than wages.

  • In North Dakota, approximately 155,000 non-elderly people spent more than 10% of their pre-tax family income on health care costs in 2008. 89% of those people have insurance, but are underinsured. 138,000 North Dakotans with insurance spent more than 10% of their pre-tax income on health care costs, and 48,000 spent more than 25% of their income.

  • By 2016, projections show that North Dakota families will have to pay around $20,000 for health care or over 41 percent of median household income. This would represent an 76 percent increase over 2008 levels.

  • In addition, more and more North Dakotans have been forced into the exorbitantly expensive individual market, as unemployment reaches massive heights. As of December 2008, 12,848 North Dakota residents were unemployed. That reflects a loss of over 1,078 jobs statewide last year alone, increasing the state unemployment rate by over .3 percentage points.

  • If the state keeps losing jobs at the rate it did last year, 14,025 people in North Dakota will be unemployed by 2010. 66% of insured North Dakotans depend on their employers for their health insurance. If nothing is done to stem the economic downturn and reform our health care system, 630 North Dakota workers will lose their current health coverage, meaning that 235 more people will likely enroll in COBRA. That leaves 395 people who will have to enroll in Medicaid, fend for themselves on the private market, or become uninsured.

  • As of 2007, 14% of all state spending has gone to Medicaid and SCHIP. $513 million of North Dakota's budget went to spending on Medicaid alone.

  • As of 2007 there were already 14,305 uninsured children in North Dakota, and more than 53,677 uninsured adults. 16,927 of uninsured adults in North Dakota also live below the Federal Poverty Line. North Dakota's economy lost as much as $269 million because of the poor health and shorter lifespan of the uninsured in 2007. That equates $4,400 per uninsured North Dakota resident.

  • Of the top 10 employers in the state of North Dakota, 8 of them are Healthcare Providers. According to the US Census, almost 42,000 individuals work in the Heath Care Sector in the state & make an average of $3,264 per month, which accounts for $137 million in wages per month.

The health of the American economy cannot improve without addressing the healthcare crisis. Building on the existing healthcare system, quality, affordable healthcare can be guaranteed to every American. It's the reform truly needed to rebuild North Dakota's economy.

Tags: COBRA, cost of doing nothing, economic crisis, economic recovery, healthcare, healthcare crisis, healthcare reform, medicaid, North Dakota, schip, state funding, uninsured

1
SEIU

Service Employees International Union
Change to Win Federation USA
Canadian Labour Congress
1800 Massachusetts Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20036
© SEIU | Privacy Policy

Take Action

  • Volunteer for Haiti relief work with fellow SEIU members
  • Support relief efforts in Haiti
  • Tell Congress to Act on Health Insurance Reform: 1-866-311-3405
  • Text 'SEIU' to 787753 for mobile updates
  • Call out Bank of America
  • Become an organizer
  • Follow SEIU on Twitter
  • Join our Facebook Group

Featured Video

The Early Years: Learn how it all began for SEIU

SEARCH SEIU.org

 

MOST POPULAR

  • Our Union
  • Healthcare
  • Members
  • Jobs
  • Local
  • Blog

ACTIVE TOPICS

andy stern anna burger bank of america banks barack obama big banks chamber of commerce congress economic recovery employee free choice act gotv2008 health insurance reform healthcare healthcare crisis healthcare reform seiu union unions workers working families

TAKE ACTION

  • Register for email updates
  • Sign up for SMS alerts
  • Become an Organizer

STAY CONNECTED

  • facebook
  • twitter
  • youtube
  • flickr

rss RSS FEEDS

  • All site content
  • Blog posts
  • Releases
  • » all feeds

MEMBERS

  • Benefits
  • Scholarships
  • Your Role as Steward
  • Institute for Change
  • Financial Service Program
  • Member Political Organizers
  • Financial Officer Training
  • Safety and Health
  • What Is Pandemic Flu

JOIN US

  • Jobs
  • Internships
  • Become an Organizer

OUR UNION

  • Contact
  • Fast Facts
  • A Closer Look
  • How Unions Help
  • Get Local
  • Legislative Scorecard
  • Press

LEADERS

  • Andy Stern
  • Anna Burger
  • Mitch Ackerman
  • Mary Kay Henry
  • Gerry Hudson
  • Eliseo Medina
  • Bruce Raynor
  • Dave Regan
  • Tom Woodruff

HEALTHCARE DIVISION

  • Long Term Care
  • Hospital Systems
  • Nurse Alliance

PROPERTY SERVICES DIVISION

  • Stand for Security
  • Justice for Janitors

PUBLIC SERVICES DIVISION

  • State/Local
  • Mental Health
  • Disabilities
  • Education
  • Child Care/Head Start
SEIU

Service Employees International Union
Change to Win Federation USA | Canadian Labour Congress
1800 Massachusetts Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20036
© SEIU | Privacy Policy