Today, SEIU President Andy Stern joined with a panel of health care advocates, insurance industry reps and other stakeholders at Sen. Baucus' second roundtable on health reform--the topic, reforming health care coverage.

During the hearing, Sen. Chuck Schumer, who's been tasked with leading the Committee's work on a public health insurance plan, played a dramatic counterweight to insurance industry representatives. (And this comes on the heels of an agreement by insurance companies to stop charging women higher premiums than men. Wonder if they're considering paying back women customers for the difference all these years?)

Schumer essentially dismantled arguments against the public health insurance plan, challenging folks squarely on the issue of transparency and competition. Ezra Klein sums up Schumer's points nicely:

Schumer went on to argue that opposition to the public plan is predicated on a high-functioning insurance market that doesn't now, and hasn't ever, existed. Private insurers, Schumer exclaimed, can't even tell you what a given treatment costs. They won't release their data on either quality or prices. This is not an elegant market that should be protected from further competitive pressures. This is a mess in desperate need of new players with new incentives. "To not have a public plan and let it compete the way [Senator Baucus] outlines in his white paper is, in my view, closeminded," said Schumer. Then he paused, and smiled, looking out over a crowd think with industry representatives. "In my view," he continued, "it may even be a little self-interested."

Schumer went on, "The bottom line is you need somebody who is not a private insurance company to be in the mix and there are many of us who feel very strongly about that... It would be giving all of you in the insurance industry an unfair advantage not to have a public plan."

SEIU President Andy Stern hammered home the fact that--despite insurance industry claims--consumers do not currently enjoy choice and competition. Stern spoke about the lack of "choice" for workers in Maine and New Hampshire, for example, who have higher costs than public workers in other states, but similar coverage.

From Andy's Twitter feed: "Senator Schumer aggressively fights for public plan. Go Chuck! Discussion on employer responsibility [sic] missing."

(And as President Stern alluded to in his tweet, stay tuned for SEIU's continuing work on shared employer responsibility. )